MR KOPI: (s.u.o.)

MR MEMANI: Now Mr Kopi, yesterday we were at the stage when you were giving hypothetical questions when I asked you about the times when you left the office and time when you got back to the office.

CHAIRPERSON: I think you should take your hand from your mouth.

MR MEMANI: As the Chair pleases. We were at the stage where you were given hypothetical answers to my questions about when you left the office and when you got back to the office. Do you remember that?

MR KOPI: Yes Sir.

MR MEMANI: Tell us, do you agree with me that you should have, you must have left the office at about twelve on that day.

MR KOPI: Sir, I shall explain the best way. When you the informer phones you and say to you let us meet between twelve and half past twelve I'm the first person to leave and arrive first at our meeting point. Maybe we agree that there are point A and point B, if you go to point A you find that point A is far from point B.

MR MEMANI: The question, for the last time. You told us that you arrived back at the office at about eleven and you stayed for about thirty minutes. You must have left the office at about twelve or half past twelve. Do you agree with me?

MR KOPI: Let me clear it firstly. I said I could have stayed in the office 30 to 35 minutes, left the office at about half past twelve.

CHAIRPERSON: That would be about half past eleven, surely.

MR MEMANI: But I'm saying the latest Chairperson to give him leeway.

MR KOPI: If the appointment was between half past twelve and to one, then I would ...[indistinct]

MR MEMANI: ...[indistinct] to the office about twelve thirty.

MR KOPI: That is correct.

MR MEMANI: Now tell me what is it that you recall specifically that you got back to the office about eleven on the first occasion and you got back again at about three thirty but you can't recall at about what time you left?

MR KOPI: It was because my informer told me a sensitive message so that I should come back early so that I should report back to my commander.

MR MEMANI: Now again what you've said is not an answer to the question. I will proceed to the next question. You told us that you remained in the office until left about four because you had an appointment for half past four.

MR KOPI: Let me put it clearly that I arrived at half past three then I went to the fifth floor, then I went to the toilet. Before I went to the toilet I saw that those people were still in the toilet and when I returned I saw them again in the toilet then I collected my belongings and then went down to the fourth floor so that we should discuss this issue with my commander. At 4 o'clock, then I left because because I knew that I have an appointment at half past four. I must report first home so that I should know they need.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman may I enquire whether the interpretation was correct with regard to having seen them in the toilet?

MR MEMANI: Mr Visser has unfortunately has not listened to the witness, but maybe ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Well let's just ask him where did you see them when you were on the fifth floor, where did you see these people?

MR KOPI: When I got to the toilet, I passed through the kitchen, I saw them in the kitchen.

MR MEMANI: Now what appointment did you have at half past four.

MR KOPI: It's with another informer.

MR MEMANI: Was it your informer?

MR KOPI: That is correct, that's my informer.

MR MEMANI: Now did you go back to the office after you saw the informer.

MR KOPI: No, I didn't go back to the office. I contacted my sectional head and reported to him.

MR MEMANI: Well, you know I find it strange that on a day when there was so important work to be done in the office you were going on with routine.

MR KOPI: We wanted to find out what would the informer say. Maybe he was going to tell us about the nineteen people but he told me something different which I'm not able to tell you now.

MR MEMANI: Now, Mr Kopi, I'm told that you are the person who drove the vehicle, actually took the people to Glen police station after the ...

MR KOPI: The are times when I took these people to that Glen police station. It might be the second or the third day but I'm not sure, but I know that I did take these people to Glen Police Station.

MR MEMANI: But it was yourself and Motsamai who took them to Glen Police Station on the first day?

MR KOPI: No, on the first day I didn't take anybody to Glen Police Station.

MR MEMANI: That was on the day subsequent to the 6th, you took them to the doctor.

MR KOPI: I don't understand, do you mean the second or the third day?

MR MEMANI: Days you drove them to the doctor.

MR KOPI: The were people whom I took them to the doctor, but I remember the day where I took these specific people to the doctor.

MR MEMANI: Took them together with Motsamai.

MR KOPI: If there was nobody who would accompany me to take these people to the doctor, my sectional commander would send somebody to accompany me to that particular doctor.

MR MEMANI: Now is it not correct, Mr Kopi, that you were Du Plooy's interpreter.

MR KOPI: If there was necessary for you to interpret you'd do so but if you were still interpreting and the informer phones you then you leave that work of interpreting then you consult your informer.

MR MEMANI: You see I'm told that on that day you were interpreting for Du Plooy.

MR KOPI: No, I didn't interpret for Du Plooy at all.

MR MEMANI: You must have knew he was your interpreter, he ...[indistinct] your officer, he called you back into the office and he needed an interpreter, you must have interpreted for him.

MR KOPI: He may call you to his office and say to you, then he say I want you to interpret for me then you would tell him that I have an appointment with an informer. If that informer phones me, then you do that. Occasionally.

CHAIRPERSON: We want to know, did you in fact interpret for Du Plooy on this first day?

MR KOPI: I did say that, I haven't interpreted for Du Plooy on the first day. I just forget the white person whom I was with on that day.

CHAIRPERSON: He didn't interpret for Du Plooy, right, that's what you say, on the first day.

MR KOPI: Yes I didn't interpret for Du Plooy on the first day.

MR MEMANI: For anyone else?

CHAIRPERSON: He interpreted for a white officer, he cannot remember which it was.

MR MEMANI: Who do you think it could have been?

MR KOPI: At times you work with many white officers so I just forgot whom I did interpret for.

MR MEMANI: Do you remember that in your evidence in chief and in your evidence throughout cross-examination you told us that what you did was to take particulars of persons, you never mentioned that you interpreted for any white officer.

MR VISSER: My learned friend didn't listen to the evidence, Mr Chairman, he made it quite clear that he acted as an interpreter when necessary.

: But there was a white officer sitting there who was taking notes.

MR MEMANI: My recollection, Mr Chairman, was that this was his functions generally that's what he does generally, the office, but when he came to this specific day, he told us that he came in at about eleven, he spoke to Du Plooy, and then he started picking people from the office. He stayed there for about fifteen minutes. I asked him what he was doing, he said that he was taking their details, their particulars, and if they didn't want to give information, he took them back. He spoke to two persons, two to three persons.

CHAIRPERSON: I interrogated one or two people, when we interrogated them they will be arrestee, I raised questions about the word, myself and a white officer taking notes.

MR MEMANI: As the chair pleases. Now, Mr Kopi, I am told you have never had an informer, in fact.

MR KOPI: The person who says I did not have informers, is playing, he wanted me to tell who my informers were.

MR MEMANI: Were your informers, the informers you saw on that day registered or not registered?

MR KOPI: Others were registered, others were not registered but the one I met on that day he was registered.

MR MEMANI: Now, every informer has got a number, isn't it?

MR KOPI: That is correct.

MR MEMANI: And what is the difference between the number of a registered informer and a number of an unregistered informer?

MR KOPI: The one which is registered, I would say, OFS7 only, the other one it will start with, there were numbers before the symbols there, then they would just put it on the particular paper.

MR MEMANI: And what did you say, how did you describe the

number of the registered informer?

MR KOPI: The registered informer would have a particular number and the unregistered informer would have a number again.

MR MEMANI: You told us that an unregistered informer's number starts with OFS.

MR KOPI: I said a registered informer would have OFS or 7 then other unregistered numbers would have a number inbetween. Would have numbers inbetween then it would say unregistered informer then they would put his number in front.

MR MEMANI: A registered informer would have a number inbetween, inbetween what?

MR MEMANI: It would unregistered informer then after that it would be a number.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, my attention has been drawn to the fact that my learned friend, Mr Memani, has his hand in front of his mouth and apparently his voice is not coming through.

CHAIRPERSON: I've already drawn his attention to that and asked him to take his hand away from his mouth, he apparently has difficulty in sitting up without holding his chin.

MR MEMANI: Now, Mr Kopi, what is, and how does the number of the registered informer appear?

MR KOPI: Sir, I've already explained that. Do you need the number for unregistered informer or registered informer.

MR MEMANI: Mr, I told you, you told us about the number of an unregistered informer and I'm saying now tell us about the number of the registered informer.

MR BRINK: Mr Chairman, really, I wonder if Mr Memani could explain where this cross-examination is leading. It seems to me to have absolutely nothing to do with the applications.

CHAIRPERSON: He said yesterday afternoon that it would become clear I'm still waiting to understand what the purpose of this is. Mr Memani, you will remember that on the regulations in the Act governing these hearings there is a limited right of cross-examination. You appear to be determined to prolong it for as long as possible. I trust that at some stage the purpose of your cross-examination will become clear. And will you take you hand away from your mouth again are you incapable of sitting up without holding your chin?

MR MEMANI: My hand is away from my mouth, Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Take it away from your chin. Sit up as if you're in a court. You aren't slumped here.

MR MEMANI: Mr Chairman, I'm not slumped here, I'm holding on to the side of my face but I'm not slumped.

CHAIRPERSON: Will you answer the objection that has now been taken.

MR MEMANI: Mr Chairman, I've already finalised the aspect that I was dealing with yesterday and that aspect was that I found it strange that he said he would be away for such a long time. That is why I was asking those questions yesterday.

CHAIRPERSON: Well as far as I'm concerned you have finalised nothing that couldn't have been done in five or ten minutes questioning.

MR MEMANI: Well Mr Chairman it was the witness is not answering the questions.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, I do object to that, with great respect we all know that the witness has promptly answered all questions and I wouldn't like this to stand uncontested on the record.

CHAIRPERSON: Carry on, Mr Memani, what's your next question?

MR MEMANI: Now, Mr Kopi, I was asking you to tell us about how the number of an informer who was registered appears.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Kopi, did you tell us that the number of a registered informer would be "OFS"?

MR KOPI: The registered informer would be "OFS" and the men would put 7 in front of "OFS". The unregistered informer it would be written "unregistered informer", then thereafter he'd put numbers then they, then lastly on the end of that then they would put another number.

MR MEMANI: Now, my instructions are that you are entirely incorrect that ...[intervention]

MR KOPI: The person who says I am not telling the correct things is the one who is not telling us the correct things.

MR MEMANI: But the number of the unregistered informer would begin with OFS and then a number and then something would be put in brackets.

ADV DE JAGER: Mr Memani, I'll be prepared to accept that that's the position. That he's wrong in this and that it's the other way round. But can you please now explain to me what's the relevance for your application?

MR MEMANI: He says that he was not at the place where people were being assaulted because he went to see an informer, that he does have informers. I am then trying, I'm saying to you he was not at any meeting with informers, in fact he did not have informers and I'm trying to test that. That is why I'm saying to him he must tell us what numbers look like for instance. Now I'm also told that the number of a registered informer would begin with an S, an S and then you get the number.

MR KOPI: I hear the S for the first time.

MR MEMANI: That you worked with Mbanjani in the office where information was gathered.

MR KOPI: I haven't worked with Mbanjani.

MR MEMANI: In the main, you were an interrogator.

MR KOPI: I said, if you are called and being instructed that you should interrogate, or interpret, you'd do that because that is a command you get from your sectional head.

MR MEMANI: No, but, we know that there were field workers for instance we've been told that there were people who worked mainly with the MK and ANC and Mbanjani told us he was mainly in the office doing, listening to the news and so on and I'm told that you worked in that office and that you were also specialising in interrogation.

MR KOPI: You tell me that Mbanjani was listening to peoples news. I don't understand as to whether was I with Mbanjani or I was with those who were investigating. Can you just clarify your question.

CHAIRPERSON: What he's put to you is you worked in the same office with Mbanjani and that you were, although you worked in the same office with him, you were employed there as an interrogator. That is what he is suggesting to you.

MR KOPI: I now understand. At times I got to Mbanjani's office but not, it was not my daily business to do that.

MR MEMANI: And in the main you were an interrogator?

MR KOPI: I was interrogating and again I was working with informers.

MR MEMANI: You are not convincing you know because you had the numbers even muddled up.

MR KOPI: That's how I remembered those numbers for

informers.

MR MEMANI: Then what is an SAP5.

MR KOPI: It's a diary.

MR MEMANI: And an SAP67?

If I may have a moment Chairperson.

INTERPRETER: The interpreters were struggling with the word "verslag", it has been interpreted as a report.

MR MEMANI: Mr Kopi, I'm putting it to you that you did not see any informer on the 6th April 1986?

MR KOPI: I tell you that I met my informer.

MR MEMANI: And you did not have any informer.

MR KOPI: I had informers.

MR MEMANI: You are saying these things in an attempt to pull yourself away from Fountain Police Station because you know that people were assaulted there on that day.

MR KOPI: I'm not taking myself out of the situation.

MR MEMANI: When you came back to the office at about three did you see that people had been beaten up?

MR KOPI: I said that I, I said I left there at half past three that I didn't see any person who was beaten. I went to fifth floor then I took my belongings then I went down to Du Plooy report to him.

MR MEMANI: Amongst the people that you conveyed to plan, did you see that some of them were injured.

MR KOPI: No Sir, I didn't see anything because when you put somebody at Glen Police Station before that person goes to Glen Police Station that person is asked as to whether does he have complaints or not. Then from there if the he has complaints they will open a docket.

MR MEMANI: And my instructions are that you and Motsamai actually told the police at length not to register any complaints.

MR KOPI: Motsamai is talking his own version, I would not agree to that. Why did not the person who has assaulted that person didn't take him to Glen Police Station?

MR MEMANI: But that's nonsensical Mr Kopi with due respect. Now Mr Kopi, the people who were beaten up were, and injured, testified that they were beaten up and that they were conveyed to the police station Glen and no complaints were registered.

MR KOPI: Mr Memani, I said to you that, I still repeat, that there was no person who was assaulted in my presence.

MR MEMANI: And you did not see that the people that you conveyed to Glen were injured?

MR KOPI: No they were fine, I did not see any person assaulted.

MR MEMANI: Now Mr Kopi, did you not hear, you say that you did not hear, what did you not hear?

MR KOPI: I just wanted to cough out I did not want to say anything.

MR MEMANI: And did you hear after the 6th that the people that were interrogated on the 6th April were beaten up?

MR KOPI: No person told me that there were people who have been assaulted.

MR MEMANI: Now, Mr Kopi, when you told us when you were speaking about Violent Street, that the person who named it Violent Street was a member of the public.

Or let me rephrase that, you told us that the name of the person, the name Violent Street, came as a result of an enquiry that was made by a member of the public who was in the offices.

CHAIRPERSON: Well he told us there was a sticker up there reading "Violent Street" and that a person was brought up from the fourth floor to the fifth floor who saw this sticker and then asked: "Is this Violent Street, is that not his evidence?

MR MEMANI: It's the same question put differently, Chairperson. Now, Mr Kopi, were there toilets on the first floor?

CHAIRPERSON: Do you mean that questions, toilets on the first floor?

MR MEMANI: Yes, Chairperson.

Were there toilets on the first floor.

MR KOPI: You are not talking about the first floor, you are not talking about the fifth floor.

CHAIRPERSON: No, he's talking about the first floor, he said specifically. Who occupied the first floor?

MR KOPI: From first floor to third floor is DK.

CHAIRPERSON: Is who? Who occupies the first to the first to the third floor?

MR KOPI: District Commander's office.

CHAIRPERSON: Do you know if he had toilets on the first floor?

MR KOPI: From first floor to fifth floor there were toilets.

MR MEMANI: You see I'm asking you this question because in your evidence you said that this person was being interrogated on the fourth floor and wanted to go to the toilet on the fifth floor.

CHAIRPERSON: What has that got to do with toilets on the first floor?

MR MEMANI: Well, Chairperson, you know that when sometimes ...[indistinct] the question by asking a person questions which might not be directly in point.

CHAIRPERSON: No, I don't know, you have been doing that for several hours now and I don't see the point of it and as I pointed out to you, you have a limited right of cross-examination. Bear that in mind, Mr Memani.

MR MEMANI: We haven't sat for an hour this morning, Chairperson.

Now, Mr Kopi, I'm putting it to you that it was, what you told us yesterday was a lie.

MR KOPI: I tell you what I told you yesterday is the truth.

MR MEMANI: Why would a person have chosen to go to the fifth floor if there were toilets on the fourth floor?

MR KOPI: There are toilets on the fourth floor. He just wanted to stretch his legs. Then you take him from the fourth floor to the fifth floor so that he would be able to stretch his legs.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Mr Memani, you said that we hadn't sat for an hour yet, but I would have thought that a witness like him, it would not have been impossible to dispose of him in fact in much less than an hour, twenty minutes, fifteen minutes but you have got your own way of cross-examination anyway.

I want to put questions to you Mr Kopi, you said, did I hear you correctly, you said something like you did take down some notes and left them when you left to go and see an informer.

MR KOPI: That is correct.

JUDGE NGOEPE: What notes were they?

MR KOPI: I took the particulars of the person I was interrogating, all his particulars, where he attend his school. I'd say he was in a school at Sungawelo, then I would write those notes to prepare for the person who was going to do the interrogation of saying here is the name, don't struggle.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Yourself, personally, you did not seek any information from any one of those people.

MR KOPI: Yes I wanted some information from them, that is when I said to him you left here, where were you going, then he said we're going to Lesotho then I said to that person: "What were you going to do"? Then at the time I received a telephone message saying your informer wants to speak to you. Then I left those notes, I left them with a person I was with in that office. Then I'm going to hear the message that person from the phone. Then I learnt that it with my informer then I, that's when I left.

JUDGE NGOEPE: You said you had interrogated two to three people. Would I be correct to assume that before you moved onto the next one you had finished with the first one?

MR KOPI: Yes I've already finished with the first one, then he said we're going to Lesotho then when I said what were you going to do then he kept or she kept quiet.

JUDGE NGOEPE: She didn't give you the information that you wanted.

MR KOPI: Yes she didn't give me the information I wanted because I said I'm going to waste time then I went to fetch another one. I'm not sure as whether it's one person or two persons or three persons.

JUDGE NGOEPE: You were not satisfied with their answers?

MR KOPI: Yes I was not satisfied with their answers then I said to myself I'm going to waste time if I continue with that interrogation.

JUDGE NGOEPE: And, well at that point I must mention to you that some of the complainants said they were assaulted because information was sought from them which apparently they did not want to depart, to impart.

MR KOPI: I will not dispute what he's saying when they say they were not assaulted, they could have been assaulted in my absence.

JUDGE NGOEPE: I will not put that to you because I am not very confident of my recollection as to whether anyone of them said you assaulted them. I'll leave it at that point but now you'll move onto the next one, to interrogate her, am I right. Because you feel the first one was wasting your time because she was not answering the questions or giving you the information you wanted?

MR KOPI: Yes I did interrogate another one, then he said he doesn't want to continue.

MR MEMANI: When you speak of interrogation, I must ask you for clarification. Were you interpreting or were you interrogating?

MR KOPI: We worked as interpreter as I was with this person we would interrogate the person, all of us, but at the same time I would be the one would be interpreting only.

MR MEMANI: And the second person that you interrogated, did you get the information that you wanted from her?

MR KOPI: I remember that maybe the third one is the one when - whilst I was busy with her the telephone message arrived then I was called to respond to the phone, then I left everything in that office then I left and then Du Plooy said take the car quickly and go and see your informer.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Are you talking about the third person?

MR KOPI: Yes I speak of the third person, I remember well, it's the third person.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Talk about the second before you talk about the third. Did you get information you wanted from the second person?

MR KOPI: I didn't get any kind of information I sought from him or her.

MR MEMANI: You were not satisfied?

MR KOPI: Yes I was not satisfied.

JUDGE NGOEPE: However, you did not assault her even though you were not satisfied, Your version is that you did not assault her?

MR KOPI: I was not satisfied and I did not assault because if you start to assault that person will tell you a lie then at the end of your interrogation you find that this person has told you a lie. That is why I don't like that person should be assaulted during interrogation.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Then you were interrupted while you were talking to or interrogating the third person?

MR KOPI: Yes I remember that is the third person.

MR MEMANI: You left to go and see your informer and subsequently in the afternoon at half past three you came back.

MR KOPI: That is correct.

JUDGE NGOEPE: At that time, when you came back at half past three following the logic of your evidence, you had still not been satisfied within that you had not yet as yet obtained information you had wanted to obtain from the people you wanted to interrogate in the morning.

MR KOPI: The time when I left I was not satisfied but when I came back I found, I received a different information which we need to follow up.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Did you at any stage make a follow up? You had made a few notes, you were interrupted, you had not got information you wanted, did you after 4 o'clock or whatever, did you make your follow-up and finish up where you had started with regard to those particular individuals?

MR KOPI: No I didn't continue with the interpreting or the interrogation. When I arrived I went to fourth floor, I went back to Mr du Plooy then I give him the information I received. Then Du Plooy said leave at 4 o'clock and go home. Then half past four, go and see that person you're supposed to see.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Do you not feel that well, you know, I need to interrogate some people and I was not satisfied, I made some few notes I must follow up that.

MR KOPI: He said to me, I will tell you, leave, do that work with your informer, meet your informer at half past four then we'll meet again.

CHAIRPERSON: Is the position that on that day there were teams of people interrogating these nineteen people, there were lots of other members of the security branch there interrogating them.

MR KOPI: I remember then it could have been like that because there were many.

JUDGE NGOEPE: You see the version given to us by at least some of the complainants is that there was such a vicious assault on them and that there were traces and evidence of assault in the form of blood on the walls and the like.

MR KOPI: I said firstly, nobody was assaulted in my presence and secondly if you talk of blood I haven't seen blood anywhere.

ADV DE JAGER: Mr Memani put it to you that you Motsamai took people to the doctor, when was that?

MR KOPI: Say a person is sick, I transported many people it's not only specifically involving these nineteen people. Even before that any person who was sick who was being detained, if Motsamai was near then I would request that I should go with Motsamai and take this person to the doctor.

ADV DE JAGER: But wasn't the District Surgeon right down in the same building?

MR KOPI: The time when I arrived there in 1984 there was no District Surgeon, he has already left.

ADV DE JAGER: And 1996, on the 6th April 1996 when the nineteen people ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: 1996?

ADV DE JAGER: 1986, sorry, when the nineteen people were arrested, wasn't there a District Surgeon on the ground floor or the first floor roundabout?

MR KOPI: No. There was no District Surgeon there.

ADV DE JAGER: Thank you, it had been at another stage then.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Memani, have you any further questions?

MR MEMANI: No questions, Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Brink?

MR BRINK: Thank you Mr Chairman. Mr Kopi, during the time that you were at Fountain, did you ever see bags which could go over heads or tubes which were used to blindfold people?

MR KOPI: I didn't see those things because I was not using them myself.

MR BRINK: Did you ever hear anyone talk about them?

MR KOPI: There was no policeman who came to tell me that there was those kind of things, the bags or tubes in the office or in the offices.

MR BRINK: Were any of the offices where interrogations took place soundproofed?

MR KOPI: I'm not sure whether they were soundproof or not.

MR BRINK: Did you ever enquire?

MR KOPI: You mean about soundproofed? You'd hear if somebody was screaming or calling, you would hear if somebody was calling or screaming.

MR BRINK: I beg your pardon, I didn't hear you?

MR KOPI: You'd hear if somebody is calling or screaming.

MR BRINK: If you were in your office, someone could shout from another office then you would hear that, is that the situation?

MR KOPI: Yes if the window is open you would hear but if the door and the windows are closed it's not quite possible to hear.

MR BRINK: Now, can you help me. Are there any regulations or were there at that time any regulations regarding the requirement that a policewoman should be present when a female detainee was being questioned?

MR KOPI: I don't know, I haven't seen a female police, only white female police were present and they were doing clerical work.

MR BRINK: No the question is were their regulations, to your knowledge which required a policewoman to be present when a female detainee was being interrogated by members of the security branch?

MR KOPI: No.

MR BRINK: I take it you read newspapers?

MR KOPI: At times, yes.

MR BRINK: The fact that there had been a number of hearings before the Amnesty Committee, where a large number of security branch or former security branch policeman have gone so far as to admit having murdered activists, you know that.

MR KOPI: Yes I saw it on T.V. I read it on the newspapers I listened on the radio.

MR BRINK: All at about this time '85/'86, a lot of them.

MR KOPI: Yes I saw that.

MR BRINK: But you say that the security branch headquarters at Fountain in Bloemfontein, to your knowledge, absolutely nothing untoward took place?

MR KOPI: I would not say that because I do not know.

MR BRINK: To your knowledge?

MR KOPI: It's difficult to say they did that because I do not know.

MR BRINK: Thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you share this office that you've told us of with anybody? The office on the fifth floor?

MR KOPI: It was the four of us. Myself, Melesi, Mafisa, Ngalo, He has since died.

CHAIRPERSON: And what sort of work did the other three do?

MR KOPI: We were doing investigation.

CHAIRPERSON: You were a team were you.

MR KOPI: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: And who was your officer in charge of you?

MR KOPI: That was Captain du Plooy.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, there is one question in ...[intervention]

ADV DE JAGER: Did you keep a pocket diary?

MR KOPI: The time I arrived they were not using the pocket book.

MR STANDER: Did you sign a register?

MR KOPI: No we were not signing a register, we were reporting directly to Captain du Plooy.

CHAIRPERSON: Would he have kept a record of when people reported for duty and when they left?

MR KOPI: I would not able to affirm that because we reported half past seven and then when we supposed to knock off duty we would report back to him again.

RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman. In 1986, what was your rank then?

MR KOPI: I was constable.

MR VISSER: Did you have anything to do with the registration of informers, the paperwork concerning the registration of informers?

MR KOPI: My work was to look for informers and to make it possible for them to be registered.

MR VISSER: And would you do the registration or would someone else do the registration in the books.

MR KOPI: There was a person who was doing the registration.

MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, I beg leave to call my next witness, Commissioner Tsomela. The Commissioner has indicated that he would give his evidence in English.

K TSOMELA: (Sworn states)

EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: You may sit down, Commissioner.

MR VISSER: You're a Commissioner and you are in fact are you not, the Deputy Commissioner of the South African Police Service of the Free State.

MR TSOMELA: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR VISSER: When did you join the South African Police, Commissioner?

MR TSOMELA: On the 3rd of May 1968.

MR VISSER: 1968. Can we go directly to April 1986 and I want to ask you generally - well first of all, what was your position during 1986 in the South African Police.

MR TSOMELA: I was a Station Commissioner at the ...[inaudible] since 1983.

MR VISSER: Since 1983. Can it be said that you were a member of the Security Branch.

MR TSOMELA: The uniformed branch.

MR VISSER: You were in the uniformed branch. You made an affidavit which you signed and which has been placed before you - it had been introduced in the evidence as Exhibit P65, Mr Chairman. Do you remember that affidavit Commissioner?

MR TSOMELA: I still remember it and I have it in front of me here.

MR VISSER: Yes, and do you confirm the contents of that affidavit?

MR TSOMELA: I will ...[indistinct]

MR VISSER: Now just generally, the period of the mid 1980's, as far as unrest and violence was concerned in the area of Botshabelo, could you just give the Committee a background of how you remember the situation to have been?

MR TSOMELA: Yes, Chairperson, unrest happened sporadically time and again in Botshabelo due to some certain dissatisfaction maybe moreover of students at schools etc., etc., which the public or policing or maybe the security branch or the C.I.D. Branch had to investigate some cases etc., etc. And my position at that stage as I've indicated was that of a Station Commissioner and I was a guardian, the helper and the protector which of each and every individual at the particular police station that I managed.

MR VISSER: I wonder if I could ask you perhaps if you could speak up a little louder if you will, Commissioner.

MR TSOMELA: I will definitely, Sir, I'm sorry.

MR VISSER: Thank you. Would it be correct to say that

around 1985/86 lots of people were arrested and moved through your police station at Botshabelo.

MR TSOMELA: That is true, Chairperson.

MR VISSER: It has been suggested here by an applicant in this case - and that applicant is Mr Ngo, that at the time when you were at Botshabelo Police Station in 1986, there was a large group of students mainly who were arrested by the South African Defence Force in the Ladybrand - I'm sorry I've got this wrong, I'm mixing up the two. There was, call it a raid, if you like, where people were arrested, a large group approximately 40 people were arrested in the Botshabelo area and brought to your police station. Are you able today to identify that particular incident or not?

MR TSOMELA: No Chairperson I cannot, as I'm saying that sporadic incident happens and the branch commanders of the different units or components lead their duties according to the available crime intelligency.

MR VISSER: May I then ask you this, if it is suggested by anyone that you as a policeman at Botshabelo, participated in the beating up of arrested persons at Botshabelo, what would be your reaction?

MR TSOMELA: Chairperson, that is totally untrue because

as I've indicated as a guardian, protector and a Station Commissioner that was not my duty. My duty was to see to the wellbeing of each and every individual that might be detained at my police station to his wellbeing. And the regulations and police act and standing order says that I should not, under no circumstances, allow an assault to take place in my presence.

MR VISSER: And are you aware of large scale assaults on any group of persons by members of the security branch from Bloemfontein at your police station at any time?

MR TSOMELA: No Sir, I cannot recall one at the present moment but I think that if there were, dockets should have been opened and I could have instructed that that should be done.

MR VISSER: Yes. Since what date have you become the deputy commissioner of the South African Police in the Free State?

MR TSOMELA: On the 1st June 1995 Chairperson.

MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman. That's the evidence Mr Chairman.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR STANDER: Commissioner, did you ever personally meet Mr Ngo?

MR TSOMELA: I don't know Mr Ngo, Sir. I cannot point him out at the present moment, I don't know him.

MR STANDER: Right, thank you very much Mr Chairman, I have no further questions.

MR DU PLESSIS: I don't have any questions thank you Chairperson.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI: Mr Tsomela, we were told about the raid of children from Kwago High School where about 40 to 45 of them are arrested?

MR TSOMELA: No, Sir.

MR MEMANI: It might not have been interpreted correctly but I'm saying that we were told about the raid of involving the peoples from Kwago High School in Botshabelo.

MR TSOMELA: Nobody did tell me about any raid Sir. The fact being that each and every component works according to his crime intelligency to his disposal of which the key is confidential you know, moreover for the affectivity of the duty as such.

MR MEMANI: These children we are told were taken to a police station.

MR TSOMELA: I don't disagree about that. As I've said many, many, many, students moreover - as I've indicated, were held at my police station.

MR MEMANI: But this was one big swoop that was made once.

MR TSOMELA: Ja, as I've indicated I don't know about any big group of children who were arrested at one time. As I'm saying

you know that happens sporadically and me myself, as I could not took part actively with those particular raids, I don't know of any big group of a specific incident.

MR MEMANI: These children were not arrested sporadically but it was a planned raid that took place at night.

MR TSOMELA: Ja, that's quite right, I've indicated that you know the raids are not organised by me as a protector and the Station Commissioner.

MR MEMANI: But surely your co-operation would have been required because it was your station.

MR TSOMELA: My co-operation would moreover come as far as logistics etc., etc., are concerned of which I think that during the unrest, have had already been given to the necessary individuals who might have needed them like vehicles etc., etc., which maybe have in totality been distributed to individuals who could have utilised them.

MR MEMANI: Mr Tsomela, this raid took place at night and I believe that you did not work at night ordinarily.

MR TSOMELA: That is true I don't work at night ordinarily but my duty during the night, I visit my station sporadically but on that particular night maybe, I don't remember of any, any children who were held at the police station maybe during a sporadic or an unorganised visit of myself. I never met

such a group myself.

MR MEMANI: Well it's obvious that this time it would have been preplanned, you would have been warned in advance that you should be present, that a raid would be carried out in Botshabelo.

MR TSOMELA: By whom? By whom Sir, be warned by whom?

MR MEMANI: By security branch.

MR TSOMELA: They could not because the fact as I've indicated the security branch won't disclose their activities because I wasn't attached to the security branch. They were not directly reporting to me, I was not directly reporting to them as such.

MR MEMANI: But surely if they needed your co-operation you've said, in respect of logistics and vehicles, they would have to speak to you.

MR TSOMELA: Moreover, the security branch, Chairperson, had their own in actual fact, logistics etc., of which maybe they have fulltime for their operations because they could not at all times come to me and maybe request such logistics. But my members maybe and the public or the police, maybe could maybe for their shortcomings could have come to me.

MR MEMANI: But you are now departing from your evidence that it, of course the police would speak to you, security branch would speak to you, and assist with logistics such as giving them vehicles and so on?

MR TSOMELA: That is true yes we have such a shortage, Chairperson, I agree with that.

MR MEMANI: So they would have spoken to you?

MR TSOMELA: Totally, - not in this incidence Chairperson, I did not - nobody ever came and informed me about this.

MR MEMANI: Are you suggesting that at some stage 40 to 45 people were arrested and detained at your police station without you becoming aware of that fact?

MR TSOMELA: Even more than that were detained in my cells of which I visited each and every morning during the afternoon and during evening.

MR MEMANI: I beg your pardon.?

MR TSOMELA: I say, even more than that were detained, happened to be detained at Botshabelo Police Station.

MR MEMANI: Now, Mr Tsomela, you must have warned about these proceedings and that you're being implicated in the, isn't it?

MR TSOMELA: No, Sir, I have not been warned as I've said and I never took part, as I've said.

MR MEMANI: You don't understand, I said you must have been warned about these proceedings.

MR TSOMELA: Will you please come again Sir?

MR MEMANI: I'm saying that you must have been warned about these proceedings.

MR TSOMELA: No, Sir.

MR MEMANI: How did you come here?

MR TSOMELA: This present residence?

MR MEMANI: Yes.

MR TSOMELA: Yes I've been warned that I must appear here.

MR MEMANI: And you were warned last year? That would be 1996 possible.

MR TSOMELA: '80, no, no, '97 that's last year Sir.

MR MEMANI: Okay. Now in all the time you had the opportunity to verify from pocket books and from records books at Botshabelo.

MR TSOMELA: To verify what Sir?

MR MEMANI: You see, you are here telling us that you don't recall this incident, and I'm saying that one would then have expected that you would go to the police station and try and see if you could see such an incident.

MR TSOMELA: Ja, that is true Sir, I didn't do that but the fact is that no date was given to me as to which particular day, the fact was that it was in 1986 and as a result of that I could not, you know, maybe recall and go to a specific date and look for this particular issue.

MR MEMANI: But are you sure that you would have been able to locate an entry that would be most, that would resemble the evidence given here, most than the rest.

MR TSOMELA: As far whom is concerned, Sir?

MR MEMANI: What I'm putting to you is that many people were arrested at Botshabelo. The numbers varied, the incidents varied and in one way or another you would have been able to see entries which would likely resemble the incident.

MR TSOMELA: As I'm saying Chairperson, I did not go to the file to verify that for the mere fact that I did not have dates etc.

MR MEMANI: Now I'm putting it to you that you avoided looking at the occurrence books because they would confirm the incident or because you did not want to confirm the incident.

MR TSOMELA: Chairperson, that is not my case but the fact is that I think those pocket books or occurrence books are still available, if the Station Commissioner at present is still keeping them so I think we can collect them at any moment.

MR MEMANI: Now, did you have any differences with Mr Ngo?

MR TSOMELA: Which Mr Ngo? I indicated that I don't know Mr Nelson Ngo that we was talking about here.

MR TSOMELA: Now Mr Ngo has got no reason to falsely implicate you and say you were present if you were not present.

MR TSOMELA: Sir, I won't know his attitude, why he has maybe thought that we have done that but the fact is that I was the Station Commissioner at Botshabelo.

MR MEMANI: Or should we accept his version because you can't recall the incident.

MR TSOMELA: What I'm saying that I don't know Mr Ngo, Sir, and I never participated, I never took part in maiming or torturing people myself.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Mr Stander, by the way did you have amongst you as your clients, complainants in respect of this particular incident?

MR STANDER: Unfortunately not, Mr Commissioner.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Commissioner, were you given handwritten statement by Mr Ngo, was it shown to you?

MR TSOMELA: The one that he has written himself, yes Sir, I did have a photocopy of that.

JUDGE NGOEPE: You see the opening sentence says:

he gives the year 1986 and then as you have already been told, towards the end of his statement there he alleges you took part in the assault and he talks about 40 to 45 people having been detained at your station and so on. I would have thought that at least if he indicates the year, and also take into account your very senior position, it would not have been difficult for you to check with the records whether such an incident did take place, the detention of 40 to 45 people at your own police station.

MR TSOMELA: I agree with your point Sir, but as I have indicated, that you know as I thought that during the whole process of the investigation that might have been done.

JUDGE NGOEPE: You yourself, didn't it sufficiently trouble you, seeing that you were being implicated, to take the initiative yourself?

MR TSOMELA: Well I didn't do that Sir.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Well shouldn't you, I mean the Deputy Commissioner?

MR TSOMELA: As I'm saying Sir, the records are available, they can be collected from the Station Commissioner.

JUDGE NGOEPE: What kind of book will show it, will it likely be the occurrence book or what? I mean if 40, let's say this thing happened, 40 to 45 people are arrested in the township, brought into your police station, they are put together in the yard there and - let's forget the question of assault, would that incident be recorded?

MR TSOMELA: The incident would be recorded for those people who are being detained in the cells. They will go through the necessary ...[indistinct], maybe there ...[indistinct], and the occurrence book as such at the register of property of the detainees.

JUDGE NGOEPE: Oh, yes, there is a suggestion that they were locked up so that they can - well there is a suggestion that they were locked up.

MR TSOMELA: Then I assume that they should have been brought through necessary registers for detainees.

JUGDE NGOEPE: And will this OB still be there at Botshabelo or elsewhere or in Pretoria or in Bloemfontein?

MR TSOMELA: No, no, no. I am talking under correction, the fact is that in terms of the - how do you call it, the stored instructions, I think they must still be there, being kept and held at the Police Station by the current Station Commissioner.

MR MEMANI: Now, Commissioner, you know Coetzee of Security Branch?

MR TSOMELA: I think I might know him but you know there were many Coetzee's here. I happen to know Coetzee but at the present moment I know which Coetzee you are talking about, as I'm saying there were a lot of Coetzee's who has gone through the security branch in Bloemfontein.

MR MEMANI: Now, I'm told that that is the Coetzee who'd make arrangements proceeding the raid with you.

MR TSOMELA: I don't know what Coetzee is that and the fact is that I could not under ...[indistinct] undertake an instruction from Coetzee as such. I was not working directly under him.

MR MEMANI: You see, it was not instructions as such but you are the person who had to provide personnel such as the riot squad and people who would assist security branch in the arrest.

MR TSOMELA: As I have said Sir, no such an arrangement was made with me but there were people on the ground responsible and commanders of the different units who were on the ground maybe to execute such raids.

MR MEMANI: Are you saying that people under you at your police station would make arrangements regarding placing personnel at the disposal of policemen from another unit without your knowledge?

MR TSOMELA: As I have indicated, Sir, the fact is that for the sake of confidentiality, they should at times you know, arrange and go and do the necessary duty that they've seen. They should ...[indistinct] further you know, making it loud making it known to each and every individual.

MR MEMANI: And you were person who is central, as a head of the police station, they could speak to you and you only.

MR TSOMELA: The fact is that I say a sensitive issue could maybe be brought to my attention but any process of a normal investigation, that would not be so necessary that they should come to me and tell me about that.

CHAIRPERSON: Was there a riot unit at Botshabelo?

MR TSOMELA: Come again, Chairperson?

CHAIRPERSON: No, sorry, I withdraw that. Did you have special constables at Botshabelo?

MR TSOMELA: I employed them, attested them in 1987 Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: In 1986 we're talking about now, were there special constables at Botshabelo?

MR TSOMELA: If I'm still correct Sir, according to my knowledge I attested them in 1987, as I was given such an instruction.

CHAIRPERSON: It would appear that the members of the - as I read it, it's not clear, that it would seem that the police who assisted them were special constables at Botshabelo.

MR TSOMELA: That can be verified Sir but I still maintain my saying that special constables only came about in 1987.

ADV DE JAGER: Commissioner, according to the statement by Mr Ngo.

Can you perhaps help me, this control yard, where was it?

MR TSOMELA: Ja, it's a control yard in a sense that the detainees van, let me call it that way, the truck it's parked in there it's just big enough to take maybe, this big truck and lock it inside there.

That's maybe the place that I understand that they might have been taken there of which they can maybe refer as the control yard, made in such a way that you know when the detainees are to be taken to court etc., they are within and encompassed in a controlled area.

ADV DE JAGER: He further alleges that:

MR TSOMELA: The trailers in front, are so transparent you know, that I don't understand how that can be done because it's at an open space where the members of the public do pass as well. So I think that if that had been done, it's very outrageous because it's an open door with two building on the sides.

ADV DE JAGER:

I'm not sure at what time this happened but afterwards they were...

Now if they've been locked up there - you said you inspected the people, the cells and so on.

MR TSOMELA: Yes every morning me today and before I knock off duty I must go through the cells and see to the wellbeing of the detainees.

CHAIRPERSON: And is a record kept of this?

MR TSOMELA: An occurrence book entry is made.

CHAIRPERSON: Of inspection of cells, no complaints that sort of thing.

MR TSOMELA: Exactly Sir, that's correct.

CHAIRPERSON: So that would be in the occurrence book?

MR TSOMELA: That's right Sir.

ADV DE JAGER: Have you seen people bleeding or their private parts swollen and heavily beaten up by plastic shamboks?

MR TSOMELA: Totally not Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: Do you have - sorry I'll go back to this now, do you have a riot unit or a riot squad at Botshabelo, Did you have?

MR TSOMELA: The actual public order policing were situated in Bloemfontein but they travelled around wherever ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: But they were not part of the Botshabelo Police Station?

MR TSOMELA: Ja, they came sporadically, maybe time and again, whenever unrest emanated.

CHAIRPERSON: Because it appears from Mr Ngo's application that Colonel Stevenson was there in charge of the operation, did you know a Colonel Stevenson?

MR TSOMELA: I know Stevenson very well and if I'm not amazed, he was stationed at Bethlehem at that time.

CHAIRPERSON: Bethlehem?

MR TSOMELA: Bethlehem.

MR MEMANI: Mr Tsomela, I'm told that no policeman from one area can go to another area and arrest people without speaking to the station commander of that area.

MR TSOMELA: Like which people Sir?

MR MEMANI: Well the people who normally arrest people.

MR TSOMELA: Okay, I think what we are dealing here with, it's Botshabelo situated within the District Commissioner of Bloemfontein and we had a unit branch of the security branch situated at Botshabelo and members of the public order policing are responsible under the District Commissioner, to curb all riots within the District Commissioner's area.

MR MEMANI: Well what I was putting to you is that I am told that there's no policemen from one area can go into another area and arrest people without speaking to the local Station Commander.

MR TSOMELA: That's what I'm asking Sir. Which policemen of a different area did come in? From which area.

MR MEMANI: Do you want to answer the question, do you want to confirm that no policemen from area can go into another area without speaking to the local Station Commander?

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, Visser on record, may I come in here. I have the same difficulty the witness has. First of all my learned friend does not inform you or anybody else where he gets his information from and more importantly, Mr Chairman, and this is what is leading to confusion and I don't want to put words in the mouth of the witness, but he's got to distinguish, is he talking about security branch members? Is he talking about riot squad members? What's he talking about? That's what's confusing us all, Mr Chairman. If he could be a little bit more specific I'm sure the witness can be very helpful in this regard.

CHAIRPERSON: Also I don't know if it's relevant but the impression I got from the witnesses, does Botshabelo fall into the same district as Bloemfontein?

MR TSOMELA: Under the same district commission of Bloemfontein by those days, Sir and even at the present moment falling then, now, under the area commission of Bloemfontein still.

MR MEMANI: Now, would you like to answer the question which I put to you, that no policemen from one area can go into another area without speaking to the local Station Commander?

CHAIRPERSON: Well you've been asked to explain what you mean from one area, policemen from one area.

MR MEMANI: Mr Chairman, to save time I'll go directly to the next question.

Mr Tsomela, my instruction are that policemen from Bloemfontein would not have gone to Botshabelo and arrested people without speaking to the Station Commander at Botshabelo.

MR TSOMELA: Chairperson as I have indicated, during unrest the Station Commissioner informed the District Commissioner and as a result of that people are placed on the ground and if we are talking about that there were riots as I'm saying there were, they could place - policemen are place enough so that they can curb riots. And the commanders in charge as I've said at the beginning do co-operate and work together and that is the responsibility of the District Commissioner because they are within his area of jurisdiction.

MR MEMANI: Look, I'm still saying to you and I'm repeating the question and you are not answering the question.

MR TSOMELA: I'm sorry Sir.

MR MEMANI: I'm told that policemen from Bloemfontein could not have gone to Botshabelo to arrest people at Botshabelo without speaking to the local Station Commander.

MR TSOMELA: Chief, I might say in the beginning they will come to me but knowing that they are in Botshabelo, the South African Police Act give them the authority to arrest whoever the traitor is.

MR MEMANI: So at least you concede they will come to you.

MR TSOMELA: They will come to me Sir.

MR MEMANI: Now, I am also told that you in fact as a Station Commander at Botshabelo, actually lodged complaints with the security branch or should I say rather, you reported to Security branch that you were having problems with unrest in your area.

MR TSOMELA: First of all what I should say Chairperson, is that the security branch are the actual people who gave us information and they are on the ground, they are people who come in contact with such information plannings and everything etc.

MR MEMANI: Would you not as a station commander have reported to security branch that you're having problems with unrest in your area.

MR TSOMELA: Ja, I will, I will if I encounter problems I will report to my District Commissioner, but as I'm saying the security branch are the fist people and they are still, people who come in contact with the planning of such incidents as such.

MR MEMANI: So you did report to security branch that you having problems with unrest in your area?

CHAIRPERSON: Did he say that? I thought he said I would report to my District Commissioner.

MR TSOMELA: Correct, Chairperson.

MR MEMANI: Yes, and so ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: That doesn't mean the security branch. He did'nt say he had reported to the security branch, did he? Mr Memani, you must listen to the witnesses answers and not then say he said something he has not. Did you say you would report to the security branch?

MR TSOMELA: No Sir, to my District Commissioner.

MR MEMANI: Now, I was also told that as a Station Commander, you are the person who was to authorise operations by staff who fall under your police station.

MR TSOMELA: At my station Sir, I make up Commanders who are assigned to do each and every particular aspect and as a result of that we had what we called a Crime Prevention Unit, of which I usually put a person in charge of that.

So I mean I've got a lot of different components like investigators etc., etc., motor car accident operators etc. So as a result of that I've got commanders who might be operating at that level.

MR MEMANI: But not at the level of conducting a large scale raid.

CHAIRPERSON: Will you please take your hand off your mouth Mr Memani so that we can hear you?

MR MEMANI: But not at the level of conducting a large scale raid?

MR TSOMELA: Well I don't know what you mean by a large scale raid because as I'm saying, our normal investigative duties are being done through that process that I have already explained.

CHAIRPERSON: What is the relevance of this? It does not tie in with Mr Ngo's application, does it?

MR MEMANI: It does Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Ngo's application says that:

and he names the four of them.

He goes on to say what they reported.

That is Ngo's version.

MR MEMANI: He proceeds later and says that Tsomela was present and Tsomela says he knows nothing about this and what I'm establishing is that he must have known about this thing.

CHAIRPERSON: Well Ngo's version is that there was a complaint made to the security branch and they said let's go and raid. And the complaint was made by, and he specifically says:

and names the three people, the unit commander, the assistant commander.

MR MEMANI: What I'm dealing with Mr Chairman is his denial that he knows about this incident.

CHAIRPERSON: He's denied it. You made you point. You go on and on and on and you are not putting your client's version.

MR MEMANI: Well, Mr Chairman, I'm not a policeman and all the things that I'm putting come from my plans or...

CHAIRPERSON: Well, I'm looking at his application before us to what he says happened.

MR MEMANI: But with due respect, Chairperson, if someone denies something, I am entitled to cross-examine him by saying that circumstances were such that he should have known about this incident. Now he's saying he doesn't know anything about it and I'm saying you were the station commander.

CHAIRPERSON: The sound has gone.

MR MEMANI: And I'm saying that you are the Station

Commander, you should have known about these things.

May I proceed Chairperson? Do you still want me to address you or do you want me to ask questions now?

CHAIRPERSON: I want to know the purpose of the questions. Are you putting the version that your client put in the application or are you putting a different version?

MR MEMANI: I'm not putting what is contained in the application, I'm putting questions to deal with the denial. I'm attempting to show that the denial cannot be true because he was the Station Commander and in all likelihood he would have known about this thing.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, may I please be allowed to say one thing. The evidence of this witness has never been that he denied that the incident took place. His evidence is that he cannot identify in his mind, in his remembrance, that particular incident, that's his evidence.

CHAIRPERSON: But the point that Mr Mamome is making is that it's not just that he would have heard of it but that they would have had to ask his permission before they carried out the operation, so it's not a question of saying: "Look it may of happened, I was not there I don't know".

Mr Memani's point which he has made, he has put to the witness is: "If outsiders come into your area they should notify you and get your permission therefore you should remember. That's you point isn't it, Mr Memani?

MR MEMANI: That's correct Mr Chair.

CHAIRPERSON: And it's been suggested that if the occurrence book shows that 45 people were detained at 4 o'clock in the morning and were in the cells the next morning, it's a little surprising that the station commander doesn't remember it?

MR VISSER: No the only point was that I understood Mr

Memani to say that he's denying that the incident took place and I was just putting that straight.

MR MEMANI: Now I'm told that the people who were arrested were then taken not to Fountains but to Grootvlei, do you recall that?

MR TSOMELA: No Sir. As I'm saying Sir, I was not dealing with the investigation as such and the arrestees, that was not my responsibility to arrange the place of retainment as such but the investigator, according to his crime intelligence.

MR MEMANI: You see I'll tell you the impression that I've got and why I'm putting this to you. The impression that I got is that in instances with security branch as security branch alone were interested in matters, they arrested people and they took them to Fountains and from there they would take them to prison. And on this occasion people were taken from Botshabelo Township into your offices, they were not taken into your cells and they were interrogated there and then taken to Grootvlei.

CHAIRPERSON: That's a prison, is it?

MR MEMANI: Grootvlei is a prison, yes.

CHAIRPERSON: So there would be records of their admission at Grootvlei, of the injuries they suffered?

MR MEMANI: If that was permitted, Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: They were taken when to Grootvlei, the same day?

MR MEMANI: It is not clear from the instructions Chairperson.

Don't you remember that incident?

MR TSOMELA: Well I was not involved in that proceeding Sir and I don't know.

MR MEMANI: But surely the detention of people at about 4 and an interrogation of people and later conveyance to Grootvlei would have taken quite some time, long enough for you to have come on duty at about 7 or 7.30?

CHAIRPERSON: There's no evidence to that effect, is there? Because the evidence was simply they were sprayed with water and locked up to recover from their injuries, it doesn't say how long.

MR MEMANI: As the chair pleases, I'll leave the matter there. Those are the questions, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Brink?

MR BRINK: No thank you Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Any re-examination?

RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Just one issue, Mr Chairman.

Commissioner, the sub-unit of the security branch about which you spoke just a little earlier, can you remember who those people were in 1986, if you can't please say so.

MR TSOMELA: Ja, the man in charge was the Warrant Officer Paul van der Berg.

MR VISSER: Second in charge, can you remember?

MR TSOMELA: Warrant Officer Mbanjani came sporadically but he was not actually permanent as far as my understanding but - well I don't know their entire internal arrangements, but he used to come to Botshabelo to assist Warrant Officer van der Berg.

MR VISSER: There is reference here to Sergeant Smith in the application of Mr Ngo, can you tell us something about Sergeant Smith?

MR TSOMELA: Sergeant Smith was for a very short while in Botshabelo. I think he passed away in a car accident within a week or two after his landing in Botshabelo.

MR VISSER: Yes, so he could have been there only for a about a week or two.

MR TSOMELA: That's right yes.

MR VISSER: Is it at all possible to find a record somewhere where one could establish the date of Mr Smith, the late Mr Smith, Sergeant Smith's death? If you could perhaps help us with an indication or a suggestion from your side?

MR TSOMELA: Yes I think from the head of the security branch from Bloemfontein he might still have his file, I hope.

MR VISSER: Lastly, was Constable Lesale, is that a person that you know personally, Lesale - L-e-s-a-l-e? Was he a member of that sub-unit of the security branch?

MR TSOMELA: I won't deny that Chairperson, but I just cannot recall him you know.

MR VISSER: You can't recall him.

CHAIRPERSON: Was this a separate unit responsible to Bloemfontein, who merely were stationed at your police station?

MR TSOMELA: It was a sub-branch emanating from the main branch in Bloemfontein Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: And were they told what they should do by Bloemfontein.

MR TSOMELA: That is quite true they were reporting to Bloemfontein main head office.

CHAIRPERSON: They weren't reporting to you?

MR TSOMELA: No Sir.

MR VISSER: Perhaps I should just place this on record lastly Commissioner. You don't deny that the incident took place?

MR TSOMELA: That is true Chairperson.

MR VISSER: It's just that you say that you can't particularly remember this particular incident.

MR TSOMELA: That is true Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: I think you go further than that don't you, you say you did not participate in this incident in any way.

MR TSOMELA: That is true Chairperson.

MR VISSER: We'll leave it for argument Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: You're not going to suggest that a Station Commander would not recollect people being beaten while naked in his police station at 4 in the morning and that he participated.

MR VISSER: No, I'm suggesting precisely the opposite Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.

FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI: Mr Chairman may I ask something which I forgot to put to the witness?

Mr Tsomela do you remember a Sergeant Coetzee who worked at your police station?

MR TSOMELA: Coetzee?

MR MEMANI: I was told Kotze.

MR TSOMELA: Kotze? A Sergeant Kotze?

MR MEMANI: Yes.

MR TSOMELA: Yes there was a Kotze at - of which I know, who was attached to the security branch at Botshabelo.

MR MEMANI: And he used to drive a Datsun 4x4 Van or Bakkie?

MR TSOMELA: Ja, ja maybe, but we had a lot of 4x4's in Botshabelo because of the unpassable area naturally in Botshabelo.

MR MEMANI: I'm indebted to the chair.

ADV DE JAGER: Mr Memani, I would like you to - not at this

stage, to keep in mind the application and when you address us kindly tell us where this incident fits in on the application and especially as far as the pre-trial conference is concerned, as one of the items for which Mr Ngo is asking amnesty.

MR MEMANI: As the Chair pleases.

CHAIRPERSON: This appears in his application at page 31 doesn't it:

MR MEMANI: That is correct Chairperson, except that you know, at this stage it seems that it would be more appropriate for Mr Visser to give the references because he is leading in chief.

ADV DE JAGER: I'm only saying that there was a 14TH paragraph, annexure annexed, and the pre-trial conference refers to those - oh, it's 2.14 thank you.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman the next ...[intervention]

MR TSOMELA: Thank you Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.

MR STANDER: Mr Chairman just before we proceed, I have been given instructions that some of my clients know some of the persons who were arrested there and assaulted at Botshabelo Police Station on this specific occasion on which we are hearing evidence.

It is also my instruction that during the following - this coming weekend we will attempt to get hold of those people and if they become available it will in order to assist the police - the Commissioner, to offer this evidence. This is being done as a result of a question from Judge Ngoepe, whether any of the persons have consulted me. That is merely just information.

CHAIRPERSON: Their names appear on the application some of them. They have been available for years, why do they suddenly think they're going to appear at this stage? If you look at page 35 of the application, he says:

MR MEMANI: Mr Chairman, to assist Mr Stander, the problem doesn't lie with Mr Stander but to the fact that the Investigative Unit did not chase these people up and did not did not give them notices. That is why they were not before - the people who came before you or became Mr Stander's clients, were mostly people the TRC had brought to him.

MR STANDER: I also want to add, I do not waste the commission's time, I just want to inform the commission that the possibility exists to assist the commission. If such persons come forward it will happen during the course of next week. If the commission tells me that I do not have to do anything further in this connection, I will leave it as such.

CHAIRPERSON: No, if you wish to notify them, or somebody wishes to notify them, I'm not saying he shouldn't.

JUDGE NGOEPE: And I should say that when I asked that question, I was not suggesting that we should open these proceedings in such a way that they should look like it's just a free for all situation. These are formal proceedings and people should come in at the right time if they want to testify and I did not suggest that proceedings should be just opened up and be allowed to get out of hand like that.

MR STANDER: I have understanding for the situation, I will leave the matter there.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, to save time, can the witness go to the witness stand so long, the next witness?

MR VISSER: Mr Sesedinyane please?

CHAIRPERSON: Perhaps there should be some enquiry made Mr Stander, because I have drawn your attention to the fact Mr Ngo names at page 35 of his application, names four of the victims. The victim Maloshono Malakane was interviewed by, on behalf of the TRC apparently and she informed the interviewer that she had never been tortured or detained at the Botshabelo Police Station in 1986 and she knows where the other people are. So if anybody wants to, they can enquire from her. She's told where the other people have moved to, she has a telephone number.

MR STANDER: I undertake to - if possible, to get in touch with these specific persons and I will inform the commission on Monday what has been done about that.

BUTINYANE SIMON SESEDINYANE: (sworn states)

MR VISSER: May I continue Mr Chairman?

Mr Sesedinyane, is it correct that your name is spelt S-e-s-e-d-i-n-y-a-n-e?

CHAIRPERSON: S-e-s-e-d- ?

MR VISSER: It's P41, Exhibit P41 Mr Chairman, I was just going to refer you to that but I will spell it again - S-e-s-e-d-i-n-y-a-n-e, and his christian names are B-u-t-i-n-y-a-n-e Simon.

Now, Mr Sesedinyane, you have a problem with your interpretation? Mr Sesedinyane, are you a member of the South African Police Service?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Since, or rather when did you join the South African Police?

MR SESEDINYANE: From 1973 Sir.

MR VISSER: And is it correct that you also became a member of the security branch here at Bloemfontein.

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Did you ...[intervention]

ADV DE JAGER: Could you kindly assist me, sorry to interrupt you. It's Exhibit?

MR VISSER: P41, 41 Mr Chairman. It may have been bound in a bundle, let me just see Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: 13, page 13 of Exhibit B.

MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman, I was just going to look for the page.

CHAIRPERSON: Sorry, it's not page 13.

MRS VISSER: No, it's not page 13.

MR VISSER: It says 13 on the index.

MR BRINK: If it's the affidavit, it's a page 108 I think.

MR VISSER: Indeed, it's page 108 of bundle B Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Is it correct that you became aware that certain allegations of illegal activity were made against you Mr Sesedinyane?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And did you thereupon make an affidavit with Attorney Wagner?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Is that the document now being shown to you and was that signed by you?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And did you make that affidavit out of your own free will without anybody cohersing you?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Do you confirm the contents of that affidavit as being true and correct?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: In paragraph 2.3 you refer to an annexure B of an applicant. Just by way of explanation, that is an annexure which refers - that refers to an annexure to Mr Motsamai's application, is that correct?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, why I'm making this point is you will recall, there is an Annexure A and the same document became an Annexure B and then there were cross-references, Annexures A and B, but they were the same document. Perhaps it will be less confusing if you bore that in mind.

But apart from the allegations contained in paragraph 12 to which we'll come in a moment, by Mr Motsamai, is it not true that you were implicated by a Mr Ngo in his application?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And that concerned the item of the, what we refer to as the Botshabelo incident?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Where is this, where is the reference?

MR VISSER: Page 31 of bundle A Mr Chairman, page 31. We must just place on record Mr Chairman, that it's not altogether clear that this is the particular person that is implicated. If you look at the handwritten document at the foot of page 35.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, he names a Samuel.

MR VISSER: Yes, the second last name.

CHAIRPERSON: That is the only reference to a name isn't it, at page 35?

MR VISSER: We're departing from the point of view that he may implicated and that's why he is presenting himself to you as a witness, Mr Chairman.

During 1985 and '86, what were your duties as a policeman? Where were you stationed with what unit were you working and what were your duties?

MR SESEDINYANE: I joined the police in 1973. I was stationed at Park Road uniform branch.

MR VISSER: And in 1985?

MR SESEDINYANE: In 1985 I was in the uniform branch and in 1986 or 1985, I was working at special duty in East London.

MR VISSER: Alright.

MR SESEDINYANE: And in 1986 on the 7th month on the 24th, I started at the security branch in Bloemfontein.

CHAIRPERSON: At what date?

MR SESEDINYANE: On the 24th of July 1986, on the 24th of July.

ADV DE JAGER: Sorry, did you say June or beginning of July, still in East London? that's 1986?

MR SESEDINYANE: I was in East London and when I left I went straight to the security branch.

MR MEMANI: Mr Chairman, before Mr Visser proceeds, we have just been instructed that the person implicated, Samuel Sinyane was a special constable at Botshabelo and is not a member of the security branch and therefore Mr Sesedinyane can go and have a rest.

CHAIRPERSON: Person implicated by who?

MR MEMANI: By Ngo.

CHAIRPERSON: But what about Motsamai?

MR MEMANI: As the chair pleases. Yes I remember now he's implicated in the forming of the church.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes.

MR MEMANI: Yes, thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. You don't say that that was not him.

MR MEMANI: No.

CHAIRPERSON: But you say that the Ngo one, that although he is referred to there as constable it was a special constable?

MR MEMANI: Yes. Mr Visser may proceed Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman. Alright, well then lets confine ourselves to paragraph 12 page 148 of bundle A, Mr Chairman. Here, Mr Motsamai in his application said that he, Mamome, Sergeant Sesesidayne, that's you, and Constable Morakile petrol bombed a parish house in Botshabelo.

He says he cannot recall the name of that parish or the church, he says the priest who was staying in that house had been involved in political activities. "Sesedinyane can furnish further information regarding that incident"

So what Mr Motsamai says is you were part of the group of people who petrol bombed the parish or the church and you can give up yourself - can give further information. Can you comment on what I've just read to you? What do you say about that?

MR SESEDINYANE: The issue that I took part in that group which petrol bombed the church or the parish, it's a lie. I dispute the whole issue.

MR VISSER: Just tell us, do you know whether a parish house in Botshabelo had indeed been attacked with petrol bombs at some stage or other?

MR SESEDINYANE: I did not hear anything in that regard. I started to know that after receiving the summons, to know that something like that happened in Botshabelo.

MR VISSER: Yes, now what church - do you go to church Mr Sesedinyane?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And what denomination do you follow?

MR SESEDINYANE: Roman Catholic Church Sir.

MR VISSER: And what about your family, them as well?

MR SESEDINYANE: The whole family, that's the father, the mother the whole family and myself, and my whole family, they attend the Roman Catholic Church and I attended school at Roman Catholic Church.

MR VISSER: Do you attend church in Botshabelo or in another place?

MR SESEDINYANE: In Bloemfontein.

MR VISSER: Now you've said it's a lie, do you mean by that that you deny that you took part in any attack on a church or a parish?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct, it's a lie, I didn't take part in the attack of that church and I did not have a reason to attack even the same church, the Roman Catholic Church or any other church.

MR VISSER: Do you know of or were you aware at the time of a priest that had been involved in political activities that you can remember about today?

MR SESEDINYANE: You mean in Botshabelo?

MR VISSER: Yes.

MR SESEDINYANE: I did not have a knowledge that there was a priest or minister who was involved in political activities.

MR VISSER: Your particular job at the security branch in Bloemfontein, would it be correct to say that from the middle of 1986 - July I think when you told us, you worked in a particular section on the security branch, is that correct?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And what section was that?

MR SESEDINYANE: It was called swart seksie/black section.

MR VISSER: Black section. Who worked with you in that section?

MR SESEDINYANE: Sergeant Mamome, myself, Motsamai, Mtyhala, I don't remember others.

MR VISSER: The point is this, was Mr Ngo part of that section at any time that you know about?

MR SESEDINYANE: I don't know Ngo, I've never worked with Ngo, I've only read about him in the newspaper called Volksblad, about his incidents. I don't know him.

MR VISSER: Isn't it a fact that when you came to the security branch in 1986, Mr Ngo wasn't in Bloemfontein any longer, so you don't know him? You never worked with him and you don't know him?

MR SESEDINYANE: I don't know him, I haven't worked with him. When I arrived I didn't find him at the security branch.

MR VISSER: Those are the questions, thank you Mr Chairman.

MR DU PLESSIS: i have no questions Mr Chairman, Mr Visser has taken over my questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Stander?

MR STANDER: I don't have any questions, thank you Chairperson.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI: Mr Sesedinyane,

when did you join Bloemfontein security branch?

MR SESEDINYANE: On the 7th month, on the 24th 1986.

MR MEMANI: This was in July?

CHAIRPERSON: ...[inaudible]

MR MEMANI: I was listening to the Sotho Chairperson,it required some thinking about.

CHAIRPERSON: He gave that evidence in chief.

MR MEMANI: As the chair pleases.

Now, before then, where were you working?

MR SESEDINYANE: I was working at uniform branch in Park Road.

MR MEMANI: And where did you live?

MR SESEDINYANE: In Bloemfontein.

MR MEMANI: Where in Bloemfontein?

MR SESEDINYANE: Blumanda.

MR MEMANI: Is that far from Botshabelo?

MR SESEDINYANE: Blumanda is right inside Bloemfontein, it's in Addisburg Road.

MR MEMANI: I meant Botshabelo, I'm sorry, the township here.

MR SESEDINYANE: I don't understand what he's saying.

MR MEMANI: Is the area where you live very far from Botshabelo?

MR SESEDINYANE: Blumanda and Botshabelo are not one and the same thing, Blumanda is Blumanda, Botshabelo is Botshabelo.

MR MEMANI: But the question I am asking, is it far from that place?

MR SESEDINYANE: I'm not able to tell the difference. After two blocks is Palming and Rocklands, then after that you get Blumanda. I would say it might be - the distance between the two, it will be 15 kilometres.

MR MEMANI: Did you not at any stage get to hear about an informer who had been exposed by students and injured?

MR SESEDINYANE: No, Sir.

MR MEMANI: Now did you not ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: I'm totally confused, you told us you joined the special branch in Bloemfontein on the 24th July 1986, is that correct?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is 1986, on the 7th month, on the 24th I joined the security branch in Bloemfontein.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, now I understood you to say when you were giving your evidence in chief, that you came from Bloemfontein to East London. Did I misunderstand you?

MR SESEDINYANE: I don't understand your question Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: You were stationed in East London at some stage?

MR SESEDINYANE: I went to East London for a three month special duty, then when I returned I joined the security police in Bloemfontein.

CHAIRPERSON: When you were in East London?

MR SESEDINYANE: Because it's three months I'm not able to put it into perspective.

CHAIRPERSON: Well, was it immediately before you joined the security police? Would that have then been May, June and July of 1986?

MR SESEDINYANE: Let me explain. I was stationed at Park Road, I left Park Road and then I went for three months special duty in East London. When I returned from East London I joined the - I went directly to join the security police on the 24th July 1986.

MR MEMANI: Now, Mr Sesedinyane, did you know Erasmus?

MR SESEDINYANE: I know him.

MR MEMANI: And was he there when you arrived at security branch in 1986?

MR SESEDINYANE: I'll not say he was there or he was not there, people come and leave. I'll not say as to whether he was there or not but I know him.

MR MEMANI: Don't you recall that he was already a member of Bloemfontein at that stage and actually stationed at Fountains?

MR SESEDINYANE: As I explained that the people would arrive and are those who leave. I'll not say I came with him or he came before me or after me, but I know him.

MR MEMANI: Are you trying to suggest that you are not aware of the presence of a senior policeman who was there when you joined this station and has never left that station according to what we've heard?

MR SESEDINYANE: If you are not working with a person directly you will not say he is there or is not there. I know Mr Erasmus, but I was not working with him directly.

MR MEMANI: And Shaw?

MR SESEDINYANE: I know him, I worked with him directly.

MR MEMANI: And he was there when you joined Fountains?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR MEMANI: And Coetzee?

MR VISSER: He has said that he doesn't remember, Mr Chairman.

MR MEMANI: That's not in the evidence, Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Has he been asked about Coetzee before?

MR VISSER: Oh, I'm sorry, Coetzee ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Will you please not interrupt Mr Visser.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, I beg your pardon, I made a mistake.

MR MEMANI: And Mr Coetzee?

MR SESEDINYANE: He was there.

MR MEMANI: Now, do you recall whether Motsamai was there in 1986 when you joined?

CHAIRPERSON: Mr who?

MR MEMANI: Motsamai.

CHAIRPERSON: ...[inaudible]

MR MEMANI: I've asked him about ...

And Motsamai, was he there when you joined?

MR SESEDINYANE: He was present.

MR MEMANI: Did you also work with him?

MR MEMANI: That is correct.

MR MEMANI: And Mamome used to work with Motsamai?

MR SESEDINYANE: That is correct.

MR MEMANI: So these are all people that you worked with closely?

MR SESEDINYANE: Yes I nearly forget one, that's Mr Ramosoeu, I just remembered his name. Those people I've mentioned they compromised our section.

MR MEMANI: And your team was a good team, the relations between members of the team were good?

MR SESEDINYANE: I don't know if we had a good relationship. What did you mean, there would be conflicts if people are working together?

MR MEMANI: Well, were you not on good terms with any member of the team?

MR SESEDINYANE: In Sesotho, when you say you are not in good terms with a person, it does not necessarily mean that you are in conflict with that person.

MR MEMANI: Were there any bad feelings between yourself and any member of the team?

MR SESEDINYANE: There was no member whom I was in conflict with because of a particular behaviour, meaning myself. I don't know of that person, I mean meaning myself.

MR MEMANI: Particularly you did not have - there were no bad feelings between yourself and Motsamai?

MR SESEDINYANE: There was no conflict between myself and Motsamai, the conflict which was there was work related. We didn't have bad blood with him but it was just then and there.

MR MEMANI: Now, you said that Mr Motsamai told us that he was with you when a certain church was bombed.

MR SESEDINYANE: I dispute that.

MR MEMANI: He told us that he went there with you and Mamome.

CHAIRPERSON: I think you should correct it, it wasn't a church that was bombed, it was a house.

MR MEMANI: A parish house.

CHAIRPERSON: A parish house. I'm indebted to your lordship. Now a parish house was bombed by yourself, Mamome and Motsamai.

MR SESEDINYANE: Sir, I've never committed such an act.

MR MEMANI: Together with Morakile.

MR SESEDINYANE: I refuse.

MR MEMANI: If I may take instructions, Chairperson?

Now you told us that you got the instructions from Shaw and Coetzee.

MR SESEDINYANE: I've never said that.

MR MEMANI: Or may I repeat, he told us that it was instructions from Shaw and Coetzee.

MR SESEDINYANE: If those were his instructions I do not know them.

MR MEMANI: Now at the time that I when Motsamai resigned from the police force was there any ill blood between yourself and Mr Motsamai, Are there any ill feelings?

MR SESEDINYANE: I do not know how to answer that question because I was not working with him.

MR MEMANI: When did you stop working with him?

MR SESEDINYANE: It's a long time Sir, I do not remember.

MR MEMANI: Those are my questions Mr Chair.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Brink?

MR BRINK: No thank you Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Re-examination?

MR VISSER: No re-examination thank you Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: It appears - I think it might assist and I think I should have done this earlier, from E2, that the date of this incident was the 18th August, 1986.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, may I suggest that we take an adjournment.

CHAIRPERSON: I think it a convenient idea. We'll take a short adjournment.

SELANE SHADRA LESALE: (sworn states)

EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, the next witness is Mr Lesale. You will find his affidavit in bundle B at page 94.

Mr Lesale, are your names spelt: your surname,

L-e-s-a-l-e? And your christian names are Selane: S-e-l-a-n-e, is that correct?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Shadra?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Did you sign an affidavit?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And is that the affidavit before you?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And do you confirm the truthfulness of the contents of that affidavit?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Are you still with the South African Police services today?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And what is your rank?

MR LESALE: Detective Sergeant.

MR VISSER: And when did you join the South African Police?

MR LESALE: 1984, on the 4th month, on the 21st 1981, sorry.

MR VISSER: 21st of April 1981.

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And did you at some stage join the security branch here in Bloemfontein?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Can you remember when that was?

MR LESALE: I don't remember the day but it was in 1985 in June.

MR VISSER: June 1985. Now in what section did you work in the security branch in Bloemfontein?

MR LESALE: I was working with the trade unions.

MR VISSER: And in doing that, were you working together with other members of the security branch here in Bloemfontein in that section?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: And who were they?

MR LESALE: I was working with Petrus Miningwa.

MR VISSER: And that is spelt M-i-i-n-g-w-a. Yes?

MR LESALE: Our section head was Captain Hendrik Prinsloo.

MR VISSER: In the type of work which you did in that section, did it come about that you worked with other members of the security branch or were you pretty much working on your own?

MR LESALE: We were not meeting with other members of various sections.

MR VISSER: Did you ever work with Mr Nelson Ngo?

MR LESALE: Not at all.

MR VISSER: And Mr Motsamai?

MR LESALE: No Sir.

MR VISSER: Now Mr Ngo has alleged in his application at page 31, that in 1986 - I'm sorry that is bundle A of course Mr Chairman, that in 1986 there was a sub-unit of the security branch stationed at Botshabelo. Do you know about that?

MR LESALE: I know of that unit but I haven't worked in that unit.

MR VISSER: So when Mr Ngo says that in 1986 - that is page 31, that you were a member of that sub-unit he's mistaken?

MR LESALE: He's lying.

MR VISSER: Then Mr Ngo refers at page 35 to your name - that's the bottom of the page, Mr Chairman, item 8, he refers to you as being one of the persons who was involved in what he alleged to have been an assault on comrades who had been arrested in a raid in 1986. What do you say about that?

MR LESALE: I never worked in Botshabelo, even what he's saying I don't know that.

MR VISSER: Now coming then to Mr Motsamai - as you stated in your affidavit in paragraph 2.3, he implicates you in three incidents and they are incidents 6, 10 and 14. Now I want to refresh your memory with reference to page 147 of bundle A where he says this: he says that he, Motsamai, Mamome, Constable Lesale and Constable Miningwa petrol bombed the parental house of one Citi Mzuzwana. Citi Mzuzwana was an organiser of the Mangong Youth Congress. Now first of all, in 1986, what was your rank?

MR LESALE: Constable.

MR VISSER: Did you know Mr Citi Mzuzwana at the time?

MR LESALE: No Sir.

MR VISSER: Did he feature at all in your investigations into the activities of trade unions?

MR LESALE: No Sir

MR VISSER: What do you say of the allegation that you were a member of that group who petrol bombed the house of the parents of Citi Mzuzwana?

MR LESALE: I know nothing about that.

MR VISSER: Do you from your own knowledge know where that house had in fact been attacked?

MR LESALE: I don't remember.

MR VISSER: Coming then to the next one which is paragraph 10, Mr Motsamai said the following: he said himself, Mamome, Constable Morakile, Constable Mtyhala, which is - well, perhaps, I'm sorry Mr Chairman, may I start again, Mamome, spelt M-a-m-o-m-e, Constable Morakile, M-o-r-a-k-i-l-e, Constable Mtyhala - this is an incorrect spelling and I'll spell it correctly, M-t-h-y-a-l-a, Constable Litseo, L-i-t-s-e-o and Constable Lesale who is yourself, petrol bombed the house of Teacher Bolosha, B-o-l-o-s-h-a who was a member of the UDF. Was this person a person that you were giving attention to as in your work concerning the activities of trade unions?

MR LESALE: It's not like that I don't know that person.

MR VISSER: You don't know him. Did you participate as a member of a group who petrol bombed his house?

MR LESALE: It's not like that.

MR VISSER: Do you personally have knowledge of the fact whether his house was in fact attacked or not?

MR LESALE: No Sir.

MR VISSER: And then, lastly ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Well, it wasn't a he was it, it was a she?

MR VISSER: One of them was a lady, it may have been ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Bolasha was a lady, she's now a teacher in Pretoria.

MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman.

Well I don't know

whether that makes any difference to your answer Mr Lesale, it was a lady teacher. Did you know her?

MR LESALE: I don't know her.

MR VISSER: And lastly, at page 148 Mr Motsamai says that himself, Mamome, Mtyhala, Lesale, Miningwa and Ramosoeu - and I haven't spelt that one yet, I'll spell it, R-a-m-o-s-o-e-u, were involved in the attempted murder of one Oupa Makubalo who was the chairperson of COSAS.

MR LESALE: That's not correct.

MR VISSER: And he says he had been implicated in the murder of one of what he calls our informers, Kosi:

Do you know anything about this incident?

MR LESALE: Yes I know the day when we were going to arrest Mr Oupa Makubalo.

MR VISSER: Who were the persons according to your recollection who were present on that day when you went to arrest Oupa Makubalo. Were you present?

MR LESALE: I was present.

MR VISSER: Was Mr Motsamai present?

MR LESALE: He was present.

MR VISSER: Mr Mamome, he was present?

MR LESALE: He was present.

MR VISSER: Miningwa?

MR LESALE: I don't remember.

MR VISSER: Ramosoeu?

MR LESALE: I think he was present.

MR VISSER: And is it true that you all went with one vehicle?

MR LESALE: Yes it was a Kombi.

MR VISSER: And where did you go.

MR LESALE: It was in the afternoon just about, we were just about the knock off. We were in the kitchen, Motsamai arrived then he told us that the person who has killed his informer, he's in Botshabelo, he has met with his other informer then he informed him that. Then he is requesting our assistance to go and help him to arrest that person.

MR VISSER: And you then left and you went to Botshabelo, is that right?

MR LESALE: That is Botshabela.

MR VISSER: I'm sorry, Botshabela. And in your own words, tell the Committee as best you can remember, exactly what happened.

MR LESALE: We were driving in the main road called Moshweshwe, Motsamai was supposed to show us the street we were supposed to take. He showed us the street and then we saw a group of boys standing. Just when we approached, he chased this person and then he shot.

MR VISSER: Just stop there. Please when you refer to a person, please mention his name. Who was the one who chased?

MR LESALE: Motsamai got out of the car and he chased Oupa, I did not know his name all the time. Mamome got out of the car but I do not remember whether Ramosoeu and others got out of the car, Motsamai shot.

MR VISSER: He shot where, at whom?

MR LESALE: He was shooting in Oupa's direction.

CHAIRPERSON: What was Oupa doing?

MR LESALE: They were standing under a tree when we arrived in the Kombi.

CHAIRPERSON: And when he was shooting was he still standing under the tree?

MR LESALE: When the Kombi stopped Oupa ran away.

MR VISSER: So he was shot at while he was running away, is that what you're saying?

MR LESALE: That is correct, Sir.

MR VISSER: Can you remember today how many shots Mr Motsamai shot at in the direction of Oupa?

MR LESALE: I don't remember but it was several times.

MR VISSER: Did you fire any shots on that day?

MR LESALE: No.

MR VISSER: Did you see Mamome fire any shots on that day?

MR LESALE: No.

MR VISSER: Was Mamome running in the same direction as the direction in which Oupa Makubalo was running or was running in a different direction?

MR LESALE: He was running in - to his direction.

MR VISSER: And Oupa Makubalo was in fact arrested that day?

MR LESALE: That is correct.

MR VISSER: Those are the questions in evidence in chief, Mr Chairman.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DU PLESSIS: Have you ever met Mr Ngo personally?

MR LESALE: Yes, for about two months if not more than that, I do not remember well.

MR DU PLESSIS: Was that when Mr Ngo was still in Bloemfontein?

MR LESALE: He arrived whilst I was still working there and I was told that he's being recruited.

MR DU PLESSIS: Right, what I really want to know is after you had left Bloemfontein and had gone to Pretoria, did you ever speak to him then, after you had left Bloemfontein?

MR LESALE: No Sir.

MR DU PLESSIS: And during the time you spent at the security police can you remember any instance whatsoever where

somebody else from another security branch from somewhere else in the country, was used in an operation by the security branch in Bloemfontein?

MR LESALE: No Sir.

MR DU PLESSIS: Thank you Mr Chairman.

Sorry?

MR LESALE: I do not remember such an instance.

MR DU PLESSIS: Thank you Mr Chairman, I've no further questions.

FURTHER EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Mr Chairman before there's cross-examination, perhaps in view of a point that has come up which may give rise to confusion, may I just ask one further point.

You told my learned friend, Mr du Plessis, that you knew Mr Ngo when you were told that he's being recruited, do you remember that?

MR LESALE: That's correct.

MR VISSER: Recruited as what?

MR LESALE: He was a student in the police.

MR VISSER: Student Constable?

MR LESALE: That's correct.

MR VISSER: Thank you Mr Chairman.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR STANDER: Mr Lesale, I'm going to ask you questions concerning the arrest and the shooting incident with respect to Mr Oupa Makubalo. Tell me, did you have other people who went out together with Mr Motsamai? Did you also have firearms with yourselves.

MR LESALE: All the policemen from the security branch had guns. I remember on that day we also had guns but I do not remember checking as to whether all of us had guns.

MR STANDER: Did you also have a gun yourself?

MR LESALE: Yes.

MR STANDER: The security police did they always take these weapons with them when they went on a mission?

MR LESALE: What are you referring to when you say mission?

MR STANDER: For example when you went to arrest somebody. Did you always take your guns with you. Your weapons with you?

MR LESALE: You must carry your gun, it was regulation to have your gun when you go to arrest a person.

MR STANDER: And on this particular day, do you know if Sergeant Mamome had his weapon with him?

MR LESALE: I said I do not remember whether others had their guns or not, I did not look at them as to whether they had their guns.

MR STANDER: Wouldn't it have been strange Sir, because you were out on a mission. Wouldn't it have been rather strange that if Mamome didn't have his gun with him?

CHAIRPERSON: Isn't this pure argument?

MR VISSER: And may I place on record, Mr Mamome will not deny that he had his firearm with him Mr Chairman.

MR LESALE: It has never been my work to inspect whether policeman had a gun in his possession, What I know is that a person must have his gun. Whether he had his gun or not on that day I do not know.

MR STANDER: Mr Lesale has been told that Mr Mamome did have his weapon with him so it's not a problem. When Sergeant Mamome got out of the